检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏鑫 SU Xin(Faculty of Education,Henan University,Kaifeng 475004,China;Institute for Educational Testing and Evaluation,Henan University,Kaifeng 475004,China)
机构地区:[1]河南大学教育学部,开封475004 [2]河南大学教育考试与评价研究院,开封475004
出 处:《世界教育信息》2023年第2期67-74,共8页Journal of World Education
基 金:河南省教育厅2022年度教师教育课程改革一般研究项目(编号:2022-JSJYYB-023)。
摘 要:良好的教师晋升评价体系有助于正向激励教师,提升教育教学质量,为高校优化人才结构、实现新的发展提供动力。当前对高校教师晋升评价的讨论主要集中在教学与科研二者地位,统一的评价标准无法应对多元评价情境等方面。文章以澳大利亚麦考瑞大学的教师晋升评价标准和流程为例进行研究,发现麦考瑞大学教师晋升评价流程规范、标准清晰,具有面向学生未来、协同社群发展以及层级明晰、双向互动的特点。A great academic promotion evaluation system is important to motivate faculty members,improve teaching quality,and provide dynamic for universities to optimize their personnel structure and achieve new developments.Current studies on the academic promotion evaluation of universities mainly focus on the status of teaching and research,where the unified evaluation standard cannot match the diverse evaluation situations.This article takes the academic promotion evaluation standards and process of Macquarie University in Australia as an example,to find that its academic promotion evaluation process is standardized with clear standards.It is oriented to the future of students,collaborates with community development,and has a clear hierarchy with a two-way interaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145