检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈立颖[1] 王焕英[1] 王鹏飞[1] 王楠 张彬[1] 秦天霞[1] 房芳[1] Chen Liying;Wang Huanying;Wang Pengfei;Wang Nan;Zhang Bin;Qin Tianxia;Fang Fang(Department of Education,Beijing Anzhen Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100029,China)
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院教育处,北京100029
出 处:《中国医药》2023年第3期424-427,共4页China Medicine
基 金:首都医科大学教育教学改革研究重点课题立项项目(2022JYZ024)。
摘 要:目的构建以立德树人为先、以研究生培养质量为导向的临床医学院研究生导师评价指标体系。方法在查阅文献、总结工作实践经验基础上,采用德尔菲法对首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院的20位专家进行两轮专家函询,从导师思想素质、教学工作、科研工作、教学管理以及导师对研究生的培养几方面构建一套研究生导师评价指标体系。结果本研究第一轮专家函询中,发出问卷20份,回收问卷20份,回收率100%,专家积极系数为100%。第二轮专家函询发出问卷20份,回收19份,专家积极系数为95%。两轮专家权威程度系数分别为0.80、0.81。专家意见的协调程度以本研究各个指标分值的变异系数表示,第一轮专家函询结果显示,各指标的变异系数为0.22~0.58;第二轮专家函询结果显示,全部指标的变异系数均在0.40以内。结论以导师立德树人为先,以研究生导师参与教学培养工作过程及研究生培养质量为导向的导师综合评价指标体系,能够促使导师更好地履行研究生培养职责,保障研究生的高质量培养教育。Objective To construct an evaluation index system for the postgraduate tutors′duty of morality-based education and training quality orientation in clinical medical college.Methods Based on literature research and practical experience summary,Delphi method was adopted for two rounds of expert correspondence with 20 tutors from Beijing Anzhen Hospital,Capital Medical University.The evaluation index system was constructed from the aspects of tutors′ideological quality,teaching work,scientific research work,teaching management and training for graduate students.Results In the first round of expert correspondence,20 questionnaires were sent out and 20 were returned,with a recovery rate of 100%and an expert positive coefficient of 100%.In the second round,20 questionnaires were sent out and 19 were returned,with an expert positive coefficient of 95%.The authority degree coefficients of the two rounds of experts were 0.80 and 0.81 respectively.The coordination degree of experts′opinions was expressed by the coefficient of variation of each index score in this study.The results of the first round of expert correspondence showed that the coefficient of variation of each index was 0.22-0.58;the results of the second round of expert correspondence showed that the coefficient of variation of all indexes was within 0.40.Conclusion The comprehensive evaluation index system of tutors,which is based on the guidance of tutors′participation in the process of teaching and training and the quality of postgraduate training,can promote tutors to better perform their postgraduate training responsibilities and ensure the high-quality training and education of postgraduates.
分 类 号:G424.1[文化科学—课程与教学论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28