中西方工程哲学自立自强之路比较研究——以“工程”概念研究为例  

A Comparative Analysis of the Self-reliant and Self-strengthening Path of Chinese and Western Philosophy of Engineering:Take Concept Research of Engineering as an Example

作　　者：高强[1] 潘恩荣[1] Gao Qiang;Pan Enrong(School of Marxism,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学马克思主义学院,杭州310058

出　　处：《工程研究（跨学科视野中的工程）》2022年第4期266-275,共10页JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING STUDIES

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“技术哲学社会人工物研究”(19BZX027);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助。

摘　　要：《工程哲学引论——我造物故我在》的历史贡献是开启了“工程”概念的独立建构过程,并最终建立了一个独立的、充分的、可靠的工程哲学。“工程”概念的独立运动起源于20世纪80年代,在21世纪初“科学、技术、工程”三元论的基础上成为独立的哲学概念。与西方离散化研究进路不同,《工程哲学引论——我造物故我在》开启了一条“工程概念”的“全生命周期”研究进路,提供了一个不同于西方工程哲学研究的完整频谱,构建了中国工程哲学话语体系。中国工程哲学已经从存在论角度基本完成对人工物世界的勾勒,未来发展空间是从造物论视角进行工程设计哲学研究。The historical contribution of Li Bocong’s An Introduction to the Philosophy of Engineering:I Create,Therefore I Am is to initiate the process of independent construction of the concept of“engineering”,and finally establish an independent,sufficient,and reliable engineering philosophy.The independent movement of the concept of“engineering”originated in the 1980s,and it became an independent philosophical concept based on“the trialistic theory of science,technology and engineering”in the early 21st century.Different from the Western approach to discretization research,An Introduction to the Philosophy of Engineering:I Create,Therefore I Am opens a“full life cycle”research approach of the engineering concept.It provides a complete spectrum different from that of Western philosophy of engineering and constructs a discourse system of the Chinese engineering philosophy.Chinese engineering philosophy has completed the outline of the artificial world from the perspective of ontology,and the future development is to study engineering design philosophy from the perspective of creatology.

关 键 词：工程 人工物 全生命周期 存在论 

分 类 号：B0[哲学宗教—哲学理论] B083[艺术—艺术设计] J50