排除合理怀疑的学理理解与司法适用  

Academic Understanding and Judicial Application of Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

作　　者：孙航 SUN Hang(School of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《中国人民警察大学学报》2023年第1期61-71,共11页Journal of China People's Police University

基　　金：国家留学基金资助。

摘　　要：作为“证据确实、充分”标准的主观判断依据,“排除合理怀疑”从主客观双重维度对我国刑事证明标准作出规范,但如何在中国语境下正确理解与适用“排除合理怀疑”仍需反思与斟酌。与我国类似,日本亦引入“排除合理怀疑”。在理论层面,通过“排除合理怀疑”、高度盖然性与内心确信之间的相互关系,可以澄清日本赋予“排除合理怀疑”之具体内涵;在司法实践层面,透过“排除合理怀疑”证明标准在裁判员制度、间接事实认定中的适用情况,可以观察日本“排除合理怀疑”的具体实践样态。我国“排除合理怀疑”的司法适用可以日本法制经验为鉴,结合我国刑事诉讼法相关规定,就“排除合理怀疑”的体系定位、内涵理解及其司法适用进行讨论。As a subjective judgment basis for the standard of“proof and sufficiency of evidence”,“beyond a reasonable doubt”regulates the standard of criminal proof in China from both subjective and objective dimensions.However,the correct understanding and application of“beyond a reasonable doubt”in the Chinese context still needs to be reflected and deliberated.Similar to China,Japan has also introduced“beyond a reasonable doubt”.At the theoretical level,the interrelationship among“beyond a reasonable doubt”,high degree of conclusiveness and inner conviction can clarify the specific meaning of“beyond a reasonable doubt”in Japan.In judicial practice,the application of the“beyond a reasonable doubt”standard of proof in the adjudication system and the determination of circumstantial facts provides a glimpse of the specific practice of“beyond reasonable doubt”in Japan.The judicial application of“beyond a reasonable doubt”in China can be learned from Japan’s experience,and the system positioning,connotation understanding and judicial application of“beyond a reasonable doubt”can be discussed in the light of the relevant provisions of China’s criminal procedure law.

关 键 词：排除合理怀疑 高度盖然性 内心确信 证明标准 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]