抵押权和租赁权之冲突解决与规则完善——原《物权法》第190条与《民法典》第405条的对比研究  

Conflict Resolution and Improvement of Provisions on Mortgage and Lease Rights——A Comparative Study of Article 190 of the Original Property Law and Article 405 of the Civil Code

作　　者：邓嘉炜 林旭霞[1] DENG Jiawei;LIN Xuxia(School of Law,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350100,Fujian,China)

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学法学院,福建福州350100

出　　处：《漳州职业技术学院学报》2023年第1期103-108,共6页Journal of Zhangzhou Institute of Technology

摘　　要：《民法典》第405条在对原《物权法》第190条进行法律继承的基础上做了法律创新,对“抵押不破租赁”的原则进行适度的限制,以此降低抵押合同与租赁合同隐蔽性导致的市场风险,平衡出租人、承租人与抵押权人的利益。为了进一步规范抵押权和租赁权并存冲突的问题,可将“抵押权登记”作为时间节点规制两者冲突的处理,并将租赁权作为形式上的物权,以登记作为租赁权取得对抗效力的要件,以完善其公示机制。With regard to the conflict between mortgage rights and lease rights in coexistence,Article 405 of China’s Civil Code has made legal innovations on the basis of the legal inheritance of Article 190 of the original Property Law.The principle that“mortgage does not break lease principle”is moderately restricted,thereby reducing market risks caused by the concealment of mortgage contracts and lease contracts.This balances the interests of the lessor,the lessee and the mortgagee,which represents a major step forward in the legislation on the relationship between mortgage and lease.However,the amendment of Article 405 of the Civil Code still has shortcomings.“Mortgage registration”should be used as a time node to regulate the handling of the conflict between the two,while registration should be used as a condition for lease rights to obtain confrontational effect,thereby improving their publicity mechanism.

关 键 词：抵押权 租赁权 抵押不破租赁 民法典 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]