“星堇派”论争与日本战后文学思想的形成  

The“Sekin School”Controversy and the Formation of Japanese Post-war Literary Thought

作　　者：莫琼莎[1] MO Qiongsha(School of Humanities and Law,North China Univ.of Tech.,100144,Beijing,China)

机构地区：[1]北方工业大学文法学院,北京100144

出　　处：《北方工业大学学报》2023年第1期22-28,共7页Journal of North China University of Technology

基　　金：北京市教育委员会社科计划一般项目“日本战后文学视阈下的‘战争认知’研究”(SM202010009005)。

摘　　要：“星堇派”论争是关于日本战后文学思想的重要探讨,它揭示了日本战后文学两大方向的异同:以加藤周一等人为核心的文学古典主义团体倡导扎根日本传统文学文化,从人道主义和合理主义出发进行文学创作;以荒正人、本多秋五等人为核心的左派政治激进主义团体则延续日本近代写实主义传统,倡导以内省式的创作理念剖析战争经历和战后现象。两者都是基于反思战争的立场,但在战争认知、文学传统再认识和作家经历的文学再现方面存在不同。The“Sekin School”controversy is an important discussion on Japanese post-war literary thought,which reveals the similarities and differences between the two major directions of Japanese post-war literature.The literary classicist group with Kato Shuyichi and others as the core advocated taking root in Japanese traditional literary culture and carrying out literary creation from the perspective of humanism and rationalism.Leftist political radical groups centered on Ara Masahito,Honda Shugo,and others continued the tradition of modern Japanese realism,advocating an introspective creative concept to analyze the war experience and post-war phenomena.Both are based on the position of reflecting on the war,but there are differences in the perception of war,the re-understanding of literary traditions,and the literary reproduction of writers'experiences.

关 键 词：日本战后文学 “星堇派” 战争认知 加藤周一 《近代文学》 

分 类 号：I04[文学—文学理论]