论屈原作品的异称及其成因  

Study on the Different Appellation of Qu Yuan's Literary Works and Its Reasons

作　　者：张世磊 ZHANG Shilei(College of Language and Literature,Shandong Normal University,Jinan 250014,China)

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学文学院,山东济南250014

出　　处：《太原师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2023年第1期40-43,共4页Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：汉代以后,世人对屈原作品有屈辞、屈赋、屈骚等异称,导致这种状况出现的原因有两个方面:一方面与世人对于屈原作品的接受有关。这种接受又以屈原作品被编成集为界,分为结集之前的具体篇章接受,和结集之后对于屈原作品集的接受两个阶段。后世混淆了前人对屈原作品这两种不同接受状态下的文体认识。另一方面,后人对屈原作品的接受,受自身所处时代文体观念的影响,依当时的文体观念来认知屈原作品,而没有回归到屈原作品所处时代的文体语境中去。After the Han Dynasty,people have different appellation for Qu Yuan's works,such as Qu Ci,Qu Fu and Qu Sao,which is related to the people's different acceptance of Qu Yuan's works.The acceptance of Qu Yuan's works is divided into two stages:specific text acceptance and collection acceptance.Later generation confused the predecessors' stylistic understanding of the two different acceptance states of Qu Yuan's works.On the other hand,stylistic concepts of the times also influence acceptance of Qu Yuan's works because readers fail to return to the stylistic context of the times in which Qu Yuan's works belong.This leads to the emergence of different appellation.

关 键 词：屈原 屈原作品 异称 原因 屈辞 屈赋 屈骚 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]