再论“诠释学”的“诠释”——从中国当代文论研究中的诠释学接受谈起  

A Further Hermeneutic of Hermeneutics-the Hermeneutic Acceptance in the Study of Contemporary Chinese Literary Theory

作　　者：曹洪洋 CAO Hong-yang(School of Humanities and Arts,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221116,China)

机构地区：[1]中国矿业大学人文与艺术学院,江苏徐州221116

出　　处：《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第2期111-120,共10页Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：江苏省社会科学基金项目“现象学-解释学视域下的‘中国解释学’研究述评”(15ZWD002)。

摘　　要：通过回顾、梳理汉语学界对诠释学与“诠释”观念的不同理解、解释、翻译和运用,我们认为,回到海德格尔是真正理解现代诠释学理论和准确把握“诠释”观念内涵的关键。海德格尔从“存在”及其意义的理解和诠释着手,将“诠释”的本质规定为语言的自我显现;在此基础上形成的西方现代诠释学理论已经构成当下诠释话语的基础。这正是受制于“效果历史”的诠释学和“诠释”理解的实情,也是我们从事关于“诠释”的对话的“诠释学处境”。现实所存在的围绕诠释学和“诠释”而产生的诸种误解,其根源即在于对此实情和处境的无视或忽视。A review of how the Chinese academic community understand,interpret,translate and apply hermeneutic and hermeneutics helps us find that it is of key importance to go back to Heidegger for a better understanding of contemporary theories and concepts relating to them.Heidegger bases the essence of interpretation on an understanding or interpretation of the significance of Being,defining interpretation as the unfolding of our tacit,lived self-understanding,and the contemporary Western Hermeneutic theories built on Heideggerian hermeneutics have shaped the basis of existing Chinese Hermeneutic discourse.This illustrates the facticity that effective-history governs how to understand Hermeneutics and interpretation,and constitutes the hermeneutic situation in which any dialogue about interpretation happens.Real misunderstandings about Hermeneutics and interpretation are rooted in disregard or ignorance of the facticity and the situation.

关 键 词：诠释学 “诠释” 诠释学接受 海德格尔 中国当代文论 

分 类 号：I06[文学—文学理论]