斯坦利·费什论文学跨学科研究的可能与不可能——兼及理论的跨学科性与反学科性  

Why Is Being Interdisciplinary so Hard to Do for Stanley Fish?A Critical Review with Regard to the Interdisciplinarity and Antidisciplinarity of Theory

作　　者：陈后亮[1] Chen Houliang(Department of English,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,Hubei Province,China)

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学外国语学院,武汉市430074

出　　处：《文艺理论研究》2023年第1期79-87,共9页Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“二十世纪末以来西方文学批评界的后批判转向研究”[项目编号:22BWW005]阶段性成果。

摘　　要：费什在理论的跨学科冲动中捕捉到一种更加根本性的反学科倾向,这在他看来是完全不可能实现的。虽然跨学科交流与合作昭示了一个内在的理想目标,但用一个基于非学科或反学科原则的体系永久取代学科制度并不现实。如果说在20世纪80年代前后,理论的跨学科性带有更多政治意味、更侧重学科意识形态批判的话,那么90年代以来的跨学科实践则越来越把重心放在方法论创新和学科功能的开拓上。在跨学科研究趋热的背景下,重新审视费什所提出的这一命题具有重要意义,有助于我们对跨学科研究所蕴含的希望和潜能保持清醒。Stanley Fish diagnoses a fundamentally antidisciplinary impulse in the interdisciplinary project of theory, which is barely possible in Fish’s view. Although interdisciplinary cooperation seems an ideal goal, it is unrealizable to replace drastically academic disciplines with a system based on undisciplined or antidisciplinary principles. While the interdisciplinary impulse of theory had been more politically motivated around the 1980s, interdisciplinary practices since the 1990s are increasingly focused on methodological innovation and disciplinary re-justification. When interdisciplinarity is becoming a new hot topic, it is of great significance to re-examine Fish’s proposition about it, which will help us keep sober about the hope and potential implied in interdisciplinarity.

关 键 词：斯坦利·费什 跨学科 反学科 批评理论 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]