检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:毋爱斌[1] WU Aibin
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学
出 处:《中国政法大学学报》2023年第2期100-109,共10页Journal Of CUPL
基 金:2020年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“国家治理体系中民事执行现代化研究”(20&ZD195)阶段性成果。
摘 要:纵观我国七十余年来的审执分离改革历程,审执分离从单纯的“执行人员与审判人员分离”“执行机构与审判机构分离”“执行程序与审判程序分离”到“执行裁决与执行实施分离”层面不断深化,逐步确立了以执行裁决权为中心的执行分工体制。随着《民事强制执行法(草案)》对深化内分的改革方向的明确,未来审执分离改革仍应以规范执行裁决权行使为中心,明确权力行使主体与“法官、执行员、司法警察等人员组成”的执行机构相配合,通过略式程序完成执行裁决权行使程序的正当建设。Throughout the reform process of separation of jurisdiction and enforcement in China over the past seventy years, it has been deepened from the level of separation of executive personnel and adjudicatory personnel,separation of executive agency and adjudicatory agency, separation of execution procedure and trial procedure to the level of separation of execution adjudication and execution implementation. Moreover, it has gradually established a power distribution system focusing on execution adjudication power. With the clarification of the internal reform direction of the Civil Enforcement Bill, the future reform of the separation between jurisdiction and enforcement should still focus on the regulation of the exercise of the power of execution adjudication, and clarify the mutual cooperation between one exercising execution adjudication power and the executive agency including judges, executors, judicial police and other personnel. The legitimacy of the procedure for the exercise of the execution adjudication power is accomplished through the summary procedure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.186.60