庭审语境下公诉人话语标记语元语用功能研究  

A Study on Metapragmatic Functions of Prosecutors’Discourse Markers in Chinese Courtroom Context

作　　者：崔向琴 程丽霞[1] CUI Xiang-qin;CHENG Li-xia(School of Foreign Languages,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116024,China)

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学外国语学院,辽宁大连116024

出　　处：《哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报》2023年第2期94-100,共7页Journal of Social Science of Harbin Normal University

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目“英汉程度副词演化的历时比较研究”(DUT21RW202)。

摘　　要：庭审是社会生活中常见的现象,其中充斥着各方参与者的言语互动。公诉人作为庭审中活跃的参与者,其使用的特殊语言手段——话语标记语值得关注。文章基于Verschueren的元语用意识,采取定量和定性分析相结合的研究方法,随机选取33场中国刑事庭审并进行语料转写和语料观察,对公诉人使用的话语标记语进行归纳总结,得出了五类公诉人常用的话语标记语,即理据型标记语、评价型标记语、言说型标记语、发问型标记语和强调型标记语,并使用Praat语音软件对其中的强调型标记语进行语音分析,以此来发现公诉人话语标记语包括突出信息/引用来源、发表公诉意见、指示言语行为、进行发问以及强调命题内容等元语用功能。Filled with verbal interactions of all parties involved in the court,trials are an important part of social life.As an active participant in the courtroom,prosecutors’discourse markers that are used as special linguistic devices deserve our attention.Based on metapragmatic awareness of Verschueren,this paper adopts a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods.Thirty-three Chinese criminal trials are randomly selected,transcribed and observed,and the discourse markers frequently employed by prosecutors are classified into five types:evidential markers,evaluative makers,speaking markers,questioning markers and emphasizing markers.The phonetic software Praat is used to analyze the prosodic features of emphasizing markers.It is found that the prosecutors’discourse markers include five metapragmatic functions:indicating information/citing sources,expressing opinions of public prosecution,showing speech acts,asking questions and emphasizing propositional content.

关 键 词：庭审话语 公诉人 话语标记语 元语用功能 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]