弗洛伊德和马尔库塞论自然、文明关系问题——兼论其美学、美育意义  

Freud and Marcuse on the Relationship between Nature and Civilization: Also on Aesthetics and Aesthetical Education Significance

作　　者：刘阳军 李童 乔越 LIU Yangjun;LI Tong;QIAO Yue

机构地区：[1]贵州民族大学文学院,贵州贵阳550025 [2]贵州民族大学社会学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《贵州民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第2期126-138,共13页Journal of Guizhou Minzu University:Philosophy and Social Science

基　　金：贵州民族大学2018年度校级基金项目“T·W·阿多诺美育思想研究”;贵州省2019年度哲学社会科学规划课题“马克思与法兰克福学派美育思想的关系研究”(19GZQN09)阶段性成果

摘　　要：弗洛伊德和马尔库塞关于自然、文明之关系问题的论述,构成了一段具有互补性、互文性的思想史。弗洛伊德选择由自然审视文明的批判路径,揭橥自然(本能、本性等)遭到压抑的“文明缺憾”逻辑,而马尔库塞则在此基础上选择自然与文明双向互动的批判路径,突出“自然-文明”共同体的总体进步逻辑。弗洛伊德和马尔库塞共同凸显了艺术和审美与自然和文明之间的反思性、共生性关系,并提示了“自然-文明”共同体美学和美育之可能取向。Sigmund Freud and Herbert Marcuse's treaties on the relationship between nature and civilization constitute a history of thoughts in complementary and intertextual ways.Freud chose the critical path of looking at civilization from the angle of nature,revealing the logic of"civilization absence"due to the suppressions on nature(including instincts and persona),whereas Marcuse moved further on this basis,selecting the critical path of two-way interaction between nature and civilization,highlighting the overall progressive logic of the"nature-civilization"community.Both Freud and Marcuse stressed the reflexivity and symbiosis that exist between art and aesthetics as well as between nature and civilization,and indicated the likely orientation of aesthetics and aesthetical education for the"nature-civilization"community.

关 键 词：美学 美育 “自然-文明”共同体 弗洛伊德 马尔库塞 

分 类 号：B83-0[哲学宗教—美学]