论认罪认罚案件中上诉不加刑原则的适用——以余金平案的论证为视角  

Application of the principle of non-aggravation of sentence on appeal in pleading guilty and accepting punishments cases——Take the argument of Yu Jinping’s case as an angle

作　　者：冷京帅 沈红卫[1] LENG Jing-shuai;SHEN Hong-wei(School of Law,Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081,China)

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学法学院,湖南长沙410081

出　　处：《佛山科学技术学院学报（社会科学版）》2023年第3期61-67,共7页Journal of Foshan University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：湖南省教育厅优秀青年项目(18B073)。

摘　　要：余金平案的二审判决书引发了理论界关于上诉不加刑原则的深入探讨。有学者从刑事诉讼法第237条第2款之规定的限缩解释角度出发,论证了二审判决的不合理性。虽然余金平案应受上诉不加刑原则的限制,但限缩解释角度的论证有明显漏洞,从认罪认罚从宽的角度论证余金平案应受上诉不加刑原则的限制更具有说服力。但是,从现行立法来看,认罪认罚案件中上诉不加刑原则的适用仍存在一定的障碍,故应当从上诉不加刑原则的例外情形、刑罚轻重的判断标准两方面进行立法修正。The judgment of the second instance in Yu Jinping’s case has triggered an in-depth discussion in theoretical circles on the principle of non-aggravation of sentence on appeal.Some scholars have argued the unreasonableness of the second-instance judgment from the perspective of the double interpretation provided for in paragraph 2 of article 237 and the procuratorate’s protest.Although the second instance of Yu Jinping’s case should be restricted by the principle of no aggravation of sentence on appeal,the dual interpretation and the argument from the perspective of the procuratorate’s protest are not very reasonable,and it should be argued from the perspective of plea and leniency in accepting punishment why Yu Jinping’s case should be restricted by the principle of no aggravation of sentence on appeal.In view of the dilemma of the application of the principle of non-aggravation of appeal in plea cases found in the process of argumentation,suggestions were put forward to revise the exceptions to the principle of non-aggravation of sentence on appeal,improve the criteria for judging the severity of punishment,and prudently exercise the right to protest.

关 键 词：上诉不加刑原则 认罪认罚从宽 量刑建议 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]