样例多样性和流畅性信念对类别学习判断的影响  

The Impact of Exemplar Variability and FluencyBelief on Category Learning Judgment

作　　者：余玉荣 刘便荣[2] 邢强 Yu Yurong;Liu Bianrong;Xing Qiang(Guangzhou Preschool Teachers College,Guangzhou 511300;Guangxi Vocational College of Technology and Business,Nanning 530008;Department of Psychology,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006)

机构地区：[1]广州幼儿师范高等专科学校,广州511300 [2]广西工商职业技术学院,南宁530008 [3]广州大学心理学系,广州510006

出　　处：《心理学探新》2022年第6期499-507,共9页Psychological Exploration

基　　金：全国教育科学规划“十三五”教育学一般项目(BBA200033);2018年度广西中青年教师基础能力提升项目(2018KY1137);广东省普通高校创新人才项目(2022WQNCX310)。

摘　　要：目的:通过三个实验考查样例特征、流畅性和信念对类别学习及其元认知判断的影响。方法:实验1采用2(样例特征)×2(测试类型)的组内设计以检验样例特征的作用;实验2采用2(样例特征)×2(测试类型)×2(流畅性)的组内设计以检验流畅性的作用;实验3采用2(样例特征)×2(测试类型)×2(流畅性信念)的混合设计以检验信念对类别学习判断的作用。结果表明:样例特征影响学习成绩、类别学习判断和流畅感;流畅性不会影响类别学习判断;原理解释能够有效建立“关于流畅性的信念”,且“关于流畅性的信念”对类别学习判断起作用。即样例多样性和流畅性信念对类别学习判断起作用,支持信念假说。The effects of sample characteristics,fluency and beliefs on category learning and metacognitive judgments were examined through three experiments,.Experiment 1 uses a 2(sample feature)×2(test type)in-group design to test the effect of sample features;In experiment 2,a 2(sample feature)×2(test type)×2(fluency)in-group design is used to test the effect of fluency;Experiment 3 uses a mixed design of 2(sample characteristics)×2(test type)×2(fluency belief)to test the effect of belief on category learning judgment.The results showed that the sample characteristics affected learning performance,category learning judgment and fluency.Fluency does not affect category learning judgment;Principle explanations can effectively establish“beliefs about fluency”,and“beliefs about fluency”play a role in category learning judgments.That is,sample diversity and fluency beliefs play a role in category learning judgments and support the belief hypothesis.

关 键 词：类别学习判断 信念 重复性 多样性 流畅性 

分 类 号：B842.5[哲学宗教—基础心理学]