检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周文静 江哲涵 欧阳劲樱 王维民 Zhou Wenjing;Jiang Zhehan;Ouyang Jinying;Wang Weimin(Department of Health Policy and Management,School of Public Health,Peking University,Beijing 100191,China;Institute of Medical Education&National Center for Health Professions Education Development,Peking University,Beijing 100191,China;Peking University Health Science Center,Beijing 100191,China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学公共卫生学院卫生政策与管理学系,100191 [2]北京大学医学教育研究所全国医学教育发展中心,100191 [3]北京大学医学部,100191
出 处:《中华医学教育杂志》2023年第5期391-396,共6页Chinese Journal of Medical Education
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目(72104006)。
摘 要:目的评价临床医学专业(本科)水平测试技能考试信度,为改进技能考试质量提供依据。方法应用概化理论对2020年完成临床医学专业(本科)水平测试技能考试的7322名考生的成绩进行研究。根据考试设计,纳入的因素包括考生、考站和考题,计算各因素的方差百分比,分析影响考试信度的主要因素,计算考试的概括力系数和可靠性指数分析考试的信度。基于完成同一套试题的考生分数,通过调整考题和考站数量,得出不同概括力系数和可靠性指数以探讨考核方案的优化。结果考题的方差百分比为70.0%~76.0%,考站的方差百分比为17.6%~24.4%,考生的方差百分比为0.3%~0.8%。概括力系数范围为0.502~0.717,可靠性指数范围为0.052~0.223。当考站数量不变,考题数量增加1道时,概括力系数增加0.002,可靠性指数增加0.002,考题数量增加5道时,概括力系数增加0.007,可靠性指数增加0.004;当考站数量增加1站时,概括力系数增加0.025,可靠性指数增加0.010,考站数量增加2站时,概括力系数增加0.045,可靠性指数增加0.017。结论水平测试临床基本技能考试质量尚存在提升空间,考站与考题是影响测试信度的主要因素,通过增加考站与考题数量可以提高测试信度,但需综合考虑测试时间及考站、考题开发成本。Objective To assess the reliability of the clinical fundamental skills test forstandardized competence test for clinical medicine undergraduates and provide an empirical basis for improving the quality of the test.Methods A generalizability theory was employed to examine the scores of 7322 examinees who completed the clinical fundamental skills test for BSc in 2020.According to the test design,examinees,stations and items were included in the analysis.The percentage of variance for each facet was calculated to identify the main sources affecting test reliability.Generalizability(G)coefficient and phi index were calculated to analyze the reliability of the test.Based on the scores of examinees who completed the same items in the test,different G coefficients and phi indices were obtained to explore the optimization of the test reliability by adjusting the number of items and stations.Results The results from the generalizability theory showed that the percentage of variance for items was 70.0%~76.0%,the percentage of variance for stations was 17.6%~24.4%,and the percentage of variance for examinees was 0.3%~0.8%.G coefficients for the test ranged from 0.502 to 0.717,and phi indices ranged from 0.052 to 0.223.When one item was added,G coefficient increased by 0.002 and phi index increased by 0.002.When five items were added,G coefficient increased by 0.007 and phi index increased by 0.004.When one station was added,G coefficient increased by 0.025,and phi index increased by 0.010.When two stations were added,G coefficient increased by 0.045 and phi index increased by 0.017.Conclusions There is still room for improving the quality of clinical fundamental skills test.The stations and items are the main sources affecting the test reliability.The test reliability can be improved by increasing the number of stations and items,but the time and the cost of stations and items need to be considered in a comprehensive manner.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49