检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王效峰[1] Wang Xiaofeng(School of Literature and Communication,Xianyang Normal University,Xianyang 712000,China)
机构地区:[1]咸阳师范学院文学与传播学院,陕西咸阳712000
出 处:《洛阳师范学院学报》2023年第4期44-48,共5页Journal of Luoyang Normal University
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(21XZW022)。
摘 要:先秦法家思想学说与政治实践的矛盾,将法家人物自身置于士、吏不同身份之间的困境中:“得君行道”的政治理想迫使其不得不选择“枉道从势”“以吏为师”的官僚体系,在“士”与“吏”之间进行艰难的角色转换;激进而笨拙的“去士”思想与行为导致其自身作为士人群体一员的生存空间消失。其政治实践的惨烈代价,从反面推动了汉以来士吏交融的进程。The contradiction between the ideology of pre-Qin legalists and the political practice plunged legalists in the dilemma of different identities between scholars or officials.The political ideal of“implementing political ideas by trust of the monarch”forced them to choose the bureaucratic system of“distorting the truth to succumb to the dignitary power”and“taking officials as teachers”,and they had to make a difficult transformation between“scholars”and“officials”.The radical and clumsy thought and behavior of“exterminating intellectuals”led to the disappearance of living space as a member of the scholars.The tragic political practice has promoted the process of the integration between scholars and officials since the Han Dynasty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222