刑事法律援助制度的结构优化——以认罪认罚案件中的有效辩护为视角  

Structure Optimization of Criminal Legal Aid System:from the Perspective of Effective Defense in Cases of Admission of Guilt and Acceptance of Punishment

作　　者：吴羽[1] WU Yu

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海201620

出　　处：《中南民族大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2023年第5期104-111,185,共9页Journal of South-Central Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“有效帮助指引下我国值班律师制度的运行困境与完善”(21CFX074)。

摘　　要：值班律师“辩护人化”是认罪认罚案件中有效辩护需求的应对方案,这也意味着值班律师将转向法律援助辩护律师,从而模糊了二者在功能上应有的界分。主张值班律师“辩护人化”,一方面是因未能立足于刑事法律援助制度体系化建构的思路路径,另一方面是因法律援助律师辩护率不高,值班律师作为法律援助辩护律师的替代方案。应构建值班律师与法律援助辩护律师功能互补的工作体制:值班律师发挥在刑事司法程序早期阶段的法律帮助功能,认罪认罚案件中的辩护职责则逐步由法律援助辩护律师承担。The“turn to defense lawyer”of the duty lawyer is a solution to the need of effective defense in cases of admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment.However,the turn causes duty lawyers to become legal aid defense lawyers,which confuses the functional boundaries between the duty lawyer and the legal aid defense lawyer.On the one hand,the turn of the duty lawyer does not take into account the systematic construction of the criminal legal aid system;on the other hand,the turn is taken as an expedient measure considering the defense rate of lawyers is low.The roles and responsibilities of the duty lawyer and the legal aid defense lawyer should be complementary:duty lawyer should provide legal aid in the early stages of the criminal justice processes,while the legal aid defense lawyer should provide effective defense in cases of admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment.

关 键 词：认罪认罚 值班律师 “辩护人化” 法律援助辩护律师 刑事法律援助 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]