循证支持的校长效能评价:维度与特点--以克利福德校长评价系统为例  

Evidence-Based Support Evaluation of Principal Effectiveness:Dimensions and Characteristics--Taking the Clifford Principal Evaluation System as an Example

作　　者：李华 雷英 LI Hua;LEI Ying

机构地区：[1]广州大学教育学院,广州510006 [2]广州大学教育学院教育公平与质量评价研究中心,广州510006

出　　处：《教育测量与评价》2023年第3期23-34,共12页Educational Measurement and Evaluation

摘　　要：基础教育问责制、教育赋权管理体制、科学主义和实用主义相结合的认识论基础,这三重力量共同推动美国校长评价向循证支持的校长效能评价转变。美国循证支持的校长效能评价以克利福德校长评价系统为典型代表,它包含校长行为效能和校长结果效能两个维度,呈现出重视校长结果效能的评价、以州为主体的校长评价职责分配、将校长效能评价建立在可靠证据基础上3个典型特征。辩证地看待并借鉴该评价系统,我国校长评价要以专业标准为准绳提升科学性与客观性,设立校长评价专门化研究中心促进校长评价的专业化和专门化,拓宽校长评价维度提高校长评价的综合性与准确性,还要特别注重研究循证支持的校长效能评价在中国情境下的适切性。The epistemology basis of the combination of the accountability system of basic education,the educational empowerment management system,scientism and pragmatism,these three forces jointly promote the transformation of the evaluation of American principals to the evidence-based support evaluation of principal effectiveness.The evidence-based support evaluation of principal effectiveness in the United States is represented by the Clifford principal evaluation system,which includes two dimensions:principal behavioral effectiveness and principal outcome effectiveness.It presents three typical characteristics:valuing principal outcome effectiveness evaluation,assigning principal evaluation responsibilities with states as the main body,and establishing long-term performance evaluation on the basis of reliable evidence.Dialectically viewing and drawing lessons from this evaluation system,China's principal evaluation should be based on professional standards to enhance its scientificity and objectivity,establish a specialized research center for principal evaluation to promote the specialization and professionalization of principal evaluation,broaden the dimensions of principal evaluation to improve its comprehensiveness and accuracy,and pay special attention to the appropriateness of evidence-based support principal effectiveness evaluation in the Chinese context.

关 键 词：循证支持 校长效能 校长评价 

分 类 号：G471.2[文化科学—教育学]