检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张如意[1] 彭迎春[1] ZHANG Ruyi;PENG Yingchun(School of Medical Humanities,Capital Medical University Beijing,100069,China)
出 处:《中国社会医学杂志》2023年第3期257-260,共4页Chinese Journal of Social Medicine
基 金:北京市社会科学基金项目(19JDSRB008);北京市教育委员会社科计划一般项目(SM202010025006);首都卫生管理与政策研究基地开放性课题(2021JD05)。
摘 要:目的探讨生命伦理学视阈下“互联网+医疗”模式中患方权益保障问题,为其良性发展提供参考意见。方法通过目的抽样法在北京市对25名居民和33名医生进行半结构化的个人深入访谈,采用主题框架法对访谈资料进行定性分析。结果“互联网+医疗”对患方隐私保护能力较差,获取知情同意较难,难以践行公平原则,其尚未达到对患者利益保护的最大化。结论应从法律政策、互联网技术、医生行为等多层面保障“互联网+医疗”模式下的患者就诊权益。Objective To discuss the protection of patients'rights and interests in the"Internet+medical"model from the perspective of bioethics,and to provide references for its sound development.Methods Semi-structured personal in-depth interviews with 25 residents and 33 doctors were conducted in Beijing by purpose sampling me-thod,and the interview data were qualitatively analyzed using thematic framework method.Results"Internet+medical treatment"has a poor ability to protect patients'privacy.it is difficult to obtain informed consent and to practice the principle of fairness.It has not reached the maximum protection of patients'interests.Conclusion The rights and interests of patients under the"Internet+medical"model should be protected from multiple levels of legal policies,Internet technology,and doctors'behavior.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4