福柯对虚无化之抵制与对人的更深探索——从《词与物——人文科学的考古学》看福柯对理性主体的批判  

Foucault’s Resistance to Nothingness and Deeper Exploration of Human——On Foucault’s Criticism on Rational Subject from“The Order of Things”

作　　者：李后卿 李宛霖 LI Houqing;LI Wanlin(Department of Philosophy,Sichuan Provincial Party School,Chengdu 610031,China)

机构地区：[1]中共四川省委党校哲学教研部,四川成都610031

出　　处：《太原师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2023年第2期11-16,共6页Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金“横断山区红色文化资源挖掘、整理、保护、利用研究”(20BDJ078)。

摘　　要：从笛卡尔到康德的西方哲学史上,人占居了认识活动的中心地位,福柯正是要对这种西方人文理性作出强烈的批判。福柯试图站在理性传统的对立面反思人文科学和现代人的生存现状,尝试还原近代以来知识的秩序性构造并给出自己的知识型解释。福柯运用知识考古学阐发西方文化史的间断性特征,并在晚期提出了生存美学概念:人在知识—权力的交错中进行审美实践并关切自身。现代人的生存只有进入伦理与道德场域,才能寻找到个体生命体验之可能。In the history of Western philosophy,human beings occupy the central position of cognitive activities from Descartes to Kant.Foucault made a strong criticism of this western humanistic rationality.He tried to reflect on the humanities and the survival condition of modern people from the opposite side of rational tradition,and to restore the orderly structure of knowledge since modern times and gave his own cognitive-type explanation.Foucault elucidated the discontinuity of western cultural history by applying knowledge archaeology and put forward the concept of survival aesthetics in his later period:human being can carry out aesthetic practice in the intersection of knowledge and power with the purpose of caring about themselves.Only by entering the field of ethics and morality can the survival of modern people find the accessibility of subject freedom.

关 键 词：人 话语 知识型 福柯 理性主体 

分 类 号：B565[哲学宗教—外国哲学]