检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高查清[1] 蔡满园[2] GAO Cha-qing;CAI Man-yuan
机构地区:[1]安徽交通职业技术学院文理系,安徽合肥230051 [2]信阳师范学院外国语学院,河南信阳464000
出 处:《五邑大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第3期72-76,94,共6页Journal of Wuyi University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:安徽省社会科学研究重大项目“中国文化走出去背景下高职公共英语教材文化板块文本研究”(批准号:2022AH040313);安徽省教育厅人文社科重点项目“中国文化走出去中译者‘把关人’角色研究——以中国典籍英译为例”(批准号:SK2019A0926);国家社科规划项目“事件概念化的心理路径起点及其功能的句法实现研究”(批准号:19BYY009)之阶段性成果。
摘 要:以朱熹和郑玄为代表的两派对《论语》中“绘事后素”之“后素”在解读上截然对立。前者解“素”为“粉地”,名词,解“后素”为“后于素”,即布好粉地然后在上面作画;后者解“素”为“以素粉勾勒”,动词,解“后素”为“后素之”,即绘画中“布完众色之后以素粉分布其间”。二者均没有充分关注孔子“起予者商也”之内涵,亦没有将“绘事后素”之语义与整个对话语境结合起来加以审视。基于对《论语》“绘事后素”章节文本结构的逻辑分析,从对话的连贯性和完整性参悟双方意图,推敲其“言外之意”,认为占据学术主流的“朱派”观点理据不足,“郑派”则对“后素”的本义作出了准确判断,惜乎对“素以为绚兮”的解释仍有失偏颇。In history,two schools represented by Zhu Xi and Zheng Xuan were diametrically opposed in the interpretation of“housu”(“后素”)in the expression“huishi housu”(“绘事后素”)in“Analects of Confucius”.The former interprets“su”(“素”)as“foundation”(“粉地”),a noun,and interprets“housu”(“后素”)as“su comes thereafter”(“后于素”).That is,foundation should be ready before painting begins.The latter interprets“su”(“素”)as“highlighting with plain powder”,a verb,and interprets“housu”(“后素”)as“highlighting with plain powder should be done thereafter”.That is,in the process of painting,“highlighting with plain powder should be done after all other colors are applied.”They neither paid enough attention to the connotation of Confucius’remark“It’s Shang(Zixia)who inspires me”,nor did they closely relate the semantics of“huishi housu”to the context of the entire dialogue for scrutiny.Based on a logic analysis,by taking the text structure of the chapter of“huishi housu”in The Analects as a whole,examining the implications contained in the context,and inferring the intentions of both sides of the dialogue with the help of the coherence and completeness of the dialogue,we can conclude that the viewpoints of the“Zhu School”,which dominate the academic mainstream,are not well-founded.While the“Zheng School”has made accurate judgments on the original meaning of“Hou Su”(“后素”),its interpretation of“It’s plainness that makes beauty”(“素以为绚兮”)is still biased.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.90.244