检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘东玲[1] 袁菊丽[1] LIU Dongling;YUAN Juli(Gansu University of Chinese Medicine,Lanzhou,Gansu 730000)
出 处:《智慧健康》2023年第13期238-241,共4页Smart Healthcare
基 金:甘肃中医药大学教改《基于“互联网+中医药”背景下混合式教学形成性评价考试改革研究-以《药理学》课程为例》(项目编号:YBXM-11)。
摘 要:目的 探讨混合式教学模式在药理学形成评价体系构建中的应用价值,为临床教学指导提供参考借鉴。方法 选取2020级、2021级药学专业的学生,2020级学生应用传统教学模式,2021级学生采取基于混合式教学模式的教学手段,对教学效果进行评价。结果 2021级药学专业学生在教学效果评价得分高于2020级学生(P<0.05);2021级学生在优秀率占比高于2020级学生,在不及格率占比低于2020级学生,2021级学生平均成绩高于2020级学生,对比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 药理学的教学实践,基于混合式教学模式的系统构建,有助于提高专业学生对教学满意度情况,提高学生考核成绩,值得推广。Objective To explore application value of mixed teaching mode in construction of pharmacology formation evaluation system and provide reference for clinical teaching guidance.Methods The paper chose students majoring in pharmacy of grade 2020 and 2021,the former were treated with traditional teaching methods,while the latter with mixed teaching methods.Teaching effectiveness was evaluated.Results Students majoring in pharmacy grade 2021 scoresd higher in teaching effective rate evaluation than grade 2020(P<0.05).Proportion of outstanding students of grade 2021 was higher than grade 2020,while proportion of failed students was lower than grade 2020.Average scores of grade 2021 were higher than grade 2020,difference in comparison was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion During teaching practice of pharmacology,system construction based on mixed teaching mode can improve satisfaction degree of professional students with teaching and improve assessment results,which is worthy of promotion.
关 键 词:混合式教学模式 药理学 评价体系 教学效果 课程成绩
分 类 号:R-4[医药卫生] G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.143.110