检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华东勘测设计院(福建)有限公司,福建福州350003
出 处:《福建建设科技》2023年第4期45-47,共3页Fujian Construction Science & Technology
摘 要:主要阐述了深基坑桩锚支护结构计算常用的两种方法,经典法和弹性法,并以厦门某酒店基坑支护(桩锚支护)为例,利用计算软件,分别模拟出基坑开挖的各个工况及受力特点,通过比较两种方法的计算结果及实际监测数据分析,结果表明弹性法比经典法更符合实际情况,且弹性法中增量法考虑了上一步开挖对下一步开挖的影响,更科学合理。This article mainly expounds two kinds of method commonly used to calculate the pile anchor supporting structure for the deep foundation pit,the classical method and elastic method.Taking a hotel foundation pit supporting in Xiamen(pile anchor supporting)as an example,the computing software was used to simulate the various conditions of the foundation pit excavation and mechanical characteristics.The calculation results of two methods were compared,and the actual monitoring data was analyzed,the results show that elastic method is more conforms to the actual situation than classic method,and the incremental method of elastic method considers the impact of the previous excavation on the next excavation,so is more scientific and reasonable.
分 类 号:TU753[建筑科学—建筑技术科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.248