检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邢建昌[1] Xing Jianchang(College of Chinese Language and Literature,Hebei Normal University,Shijiazhuang 050024,Hebei,China)
机构地区:[1]河北师范大学文学院、美学与艺术研究中心,河北省石家庄市050024
出 处:《文艺理论研究》2023年第3期59-68,共10页Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“近40年文学理论知识生成机制的反思性研究与文献整理”[项目编号:19BZW002]的阶段性成果。
摘 要:反思性研究是一种滤去感性、回到本根、凝视自身的研究。反思性研究是人文学科最活跃,最具批判潜能和思想能量的研究范式。反思性研究绝不只是“回头看”的研究,还体现一种对自身如何可能的问询态度。反思性研究是理论高度自觉的产物。理论研究如何可能,理论言说的限度何在,谁为理论的合法性辩护,这是反思性研究提出的基本问题。反思性研究也是人文学科的学科特性与旨趣的内在要求,对个别、独特的价值事实的关切,内在地要求文学理论把反思性作为思想在场的方式。知识学模式,也可以称为知识学视角、知识型。知识学模式的生成机制是跨学科,基于问题的。基于知识学模式的文学理论反思性研究,应该致力于揭示文学理论研究的知识学立场,从而使文学理论的知识生产从意见的表达、经验的归纳和各种“主义”的论争中超越出来,形成自己独特的观测文学和各种社会文化问题的视角、观念和话语。Reflective study attempts to eliminate sensibility,return to the origin,and take a gaze at itself.It is the most active and critical research model that contains great potential for thought.It not only aims to“look back”,but also embodies a questioning attitude toward the possibility of its own existence.Reflective study is the product of high-level theoretical self-awareness.The fundamental subjects of reflective study include the possibility of theoretical research,the limits of theoretical exploration,and the defender of the legitimacy of theoretical research.Reflective study is also an innate requirement derived from the characteristics and purports of the humanities.The care for the value of individual or particular fact of the humanities naturally requires a reflective stance as a way of theoretical presence.The generative mechanism of knowledge models,also known as the epistemological perspective orépistémè,is question-based and interdisciplinary.The reflective study of literary theory based on epistemological models should aim to reveal the epistemological standpoint of different literary theories,in order to form its own perspectives,ideas and discourse through observing various literary and cultural issues,while discarding the confusion of opinion expression,empirical induction,and“ism”arguments.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30