检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗福益 LUO Fuyi
出 处:《闽南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2023年第2期146-152,共7页Journal of Minnan Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
基 金:全国教育科学规划国家一般课题(BOA180045)。
摘 要:教育学的学科合法性一直备受质疑,教育学界对教育学学科合法性的追求也从未停止。长期以来,教育学界将是否具有独特的研究对象和方法、是否具有独立的知识体系、是否或者能否成为一门科学作为评判一门学科是否具有合法性的依据,使教育学深陷错误的学科衡量标准的陷阱无法自拔,学科合法性危机进一步加剧。实际上,教育学的学科合法性建立在其功用之上。教育学谋求学科合法性的根本出路就在于通过不断消除束缚教育学功用发挥的观念和制度障碍,使其能够行之有效地解释和解决现实教育问题。The disciplinary legitimacy of pedagogy has been questioned sinceitsbirth,and the pursuit of the disciplinary legitimacy of pedagogy has never stopped.For a long time,the educational circle has taken the following criteria to judge the legitimacy of a discipline:whether it has a unique research object and method,whether it has an independent knowledge system,and whether it can become a science.This judgement has caused pedagogy to be trapped in erroneous discipline measurement criteria and the legitimacy crisis of the discipline has been further exacerbated.Actually,the disciplinary legitimacy of pedagogy is based on its function.The fundamental solution to the pursuit of legitimacy of the discipline is to continuously eliminate the conceptual and institutional obstacles that restrict the function of pedagogy,so that it can effectively explain and solve the real educational problems.
分 类 号:G40[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49