人格权禁令独立性的保全路径——以起诉期间制度为核心  

The Independence of the Personality Rights Injunction through Preservation Procedure:Centered at Duration to Claim

作　　者：刘子赫 Liu Zihe

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院

出　　处：《财经法学》2023年第5期177-192,共16页Law and Economy

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“民法典与民事诉讼法的协同实施研究”(22&ZD206)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：人格权禁令适用保全程序的主要障碍,是禁令独立性和保全辅助性之间的性质冲突,这尤其体现在诉前保全的起诉期间制度。但是,既有对人格权禁令与保全间差异的分析同样存在缺陷,禁令的独立性并非必然指向终局性裁判,也可以是减轻申请人起诉义务的制度安排。自我国诉前行为保全的立法制度史和相关比较法经验来看,起诉期间的制度设计存在更具当事人主义色彩的其他可能模式,故人格权禁令并非必须通过新设禁令制度解决。The main obstacle to the application of personality rights injunction through the preservation procedure is the conflict between the independence of the injunction and the subsidiarity of the preservation,and the duration to claim of the pre-litigation preservation procedure is the prominence of the problem.However,the analysis on the differences between the personality rights injunction and the preservation procedure has its drawbacks,which is the independence of the injunction does not only refer to a final decision,but also to reduction of the applicants'obligation to initiate the proceedings later.According to the legislative system history of China's pre-litigation behavior preservation and related comparative law,there is more party-oriented design for the rules of duration to claim,so the personality rights injunction is not necessarily applied through a newly established injunction procedure.

关 键 词：人格权禁令 诉前保全 起诉期间 海事请求保全 当事人主义 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学] D923[政治法律—法学]