从粗放走向规范:我国学校体育思想研究的问题审思与路向转换  

Transitioning from Extensive to Standardized Research:Reflections on Issues and Shifting Direction in the Study of School Physical Education Thought in China

作　　者：邵天逸 李启迪[1] SHAO Tianyi;LI Qidi(School of Physical Education and Health Sciences,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua 321004,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江师范大学体育与健康科学学院,浙江金华321004

出　　处：《体育科学》2023年第5期89-96,F0003,共9页China Sport Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目(17ATY008)。

摘　　要：运用文本分析与逻辑思辨方法,对我国学校体育思想研究展开学理分析,在揭示、澄清相关认知与思维局限基础上,提出规范研究思路。研究指出:1)我国学校体育思想史学分期主要存在历史阶段无法囊括思想完整历程、重要思想难以定义历史阶段、分期思路与思想演进实际状况错位等问题;2)学校体育思想研究泛化主要源于过多纳入其他领域学术概念、对思想表述及属性的多元诠释以及与人物思想研究相混同等问题;3)学校体育思想研究视点总体存在历史研究薄弱、人物研究与流派研究选题混淆以及相关视角适配度不足等问题;4)目前我国学校体育思想研究范式尚待确立,其中思想史研究范式存在相关研究范式借鉴不足、思想流派研究相对粗糙等问题,个案研究范式则存在研究思路局限、方法运用不佳等问题。基于当前学校体育思想研究呈现的粗放状态与问题困境,提出后续规范研究建议:合理设定学校体育思想分期方式,保障史学分期切合历史进程;重新确立学校体育思想界定标准,保障概念认知吻合对象特质;科学纳入学校体育思想参照视角,保障视角选取贴合研究主题;深度优化学校体育思想研究方法,保障方法运用投合问题指向。Employing text analysis and logical reasoning methods,this study undertakes a theoretical analysis of the research on school physical education(PE)thought in China.Its goal is to propose a standardized research approach by uncovering and addressing various cognitive and conceptual limitations.The study highlights the following concerns:1)The historical periodization of school PE thought in China faces several challenges,including an inability to encompass the complete historical trajectory,difficulty in defining critical ideas’historical stages,and a disconnect between periodization frameworks and the actual evolution of thought.2)The generalization observed in research on school PE thought largely stems from the over-encroachment of academic concepts from other fields,diverse interpretations of thought expressions and attributes,and a conflation with the study of individual thinkers’ideas.3)In general,research perspectives on school PE thought in China exhibit weaknesses in historical analysis,confusion between studies of individual thinkers and schools of thought,and inadequate alignment with relevant viewpoints.4)The current paradigm for studying school PE thought in China remains undefined.Issues within the paradigm for the history of thought research include insufficient borrowing from related research paradigms,and relatively underdeveloped studies on schools of thought.The paradigm for individual case studies faces limitations in research approaches and methodological application.Considering the current state of fragmented research and the challenges encountered in the study of school PE thought,this study suggests the following standardized research recommendations:Establishing a reasonable framework for periodizing school PE thought,ensuring that historical periodization aligns with historical developments;re-establishing clear criteria for defining school PE thought,ensuring that conceptual understanding aligns with the characteristics of the subject matter;systematically incorporating reference per

关 键 词：学校体育思想 分期 概念 视角 范式 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]