检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔健波[1] 罗正英[2] CUI Jian-bo;LUO Zheng-ying(School of Economics and Management,Jiangsu University of Science and Technology,Zhenjiang 212100,China;Dongwu Business School,Soochow University,Suzhou 215006,China)
机构地区:[1]江苏科技大学经济管理学院,江苏镇江212100 [2]苏州大学东吴商学院,江苏苏州215006
出 处:《中国管理科学》2023年第8期90-99,共10页Chinese Journal of Management Science
基 金:江苏省社会科学基金资助一般项目(19GLB004)。
摘 要:国企总部授权生产单元进行成本控制,预期到上期绩效可能成为下期成本预算的参考,高能力管理者有动机在当期付出低努力、假扮低能力管理者,隐藏真实效率,实现高成本,棘轮效应出现。考察并比较两个激励机制,即节约分成(成本实际数低于预算数的分成)和目标分成(实现成本降低目标后的节约分成)对这一效应的作用。动态、逆向选择的委托代理关系下,委托人承诺长期特定激励机制(有着固定结构和变动参数),但不承诺任何跨期激励方案(有着固定结构和固定参数),棘轮效应出现,且随激励机制不同而变化。研究表明,在一个完美贝叶斯均衡中,相比节约分成激励机制,目标分成激励机制更能弱化棘轮效应。In response to the impact of Novel coronavirus pneumonia,China State Shipbuilding Corporation Limited is implementing Cost Engineering Project regarded as a life project concerning the future destiny of the group.China State Shipbuilding Corporation Limited is trying its best to reduce the cost and expenses of shipbuilding.Our universtiy has a long history with the group and used to belong to it.Being separated,both sides still have closely strategic cooperation.Therefore,we are deeply involved in this project lasted for one year.During the course of cooperation,it seems that there was a serious asymmetry about shipbuilding cost information between group and shipyards.Headquarters of state-owned enterprise(principal)authorizes produc⁃tion unit(agent)to proceed cost control.It is reasonable to anticipate that the performance of cost control in previous period might become the reference of next budget cost.Agent with high ability is inclined to make low effort so as to conceal real efficiency,high cost followed in current period,which is ratchet effect.The impact of two kinds of incentive mechanism is examined and compared,i.e.,saving sharing of cost reduction(realized number of cost is lower than budget)and target sharing(share after completion of cost reduction target),on the ratchet effect.In a principal-agent relationship with dynamic and adverse selection,the principal commits a longterm specific incentive mechanism(with fixed structure and variable parameters),but doesn't commit intertemporal incentive scheme(with fixed structure and fixed parameters).Then the ratchet effect occurs but varies with the different incentive mechanism.Game theory is employed to explore the analysis framework of principal-agent based on the theory of information asymmetry.This study shows target sharing incentive mechanism(TIM)could weaken ratchet effect efficiently compared with saving sharing incentive mechanism(SIM)in a perfect Bayesian equilibrium.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.23.102.227