检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾晓燕[1] 陈晓湘[1] 李媛[2] ZENG Xiaoyan;CHEN Xiaoxiang;LI Yuan(School of Foreign Languages,Hunan University,Changsha 410082,China;School of International Studies,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南大学,湖南省长沙市410082 [2]浙江大学,浙江省杭州市310058
出 处:《外语教学与研究》2023年第5期715-726,800,共13页Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基 金:第十一批“中国外语教育基金”项目“汉、日、德背景学习者英语时体标记习得的研究”(ZGWYJYJJ11Z032);湖南省哲学社科基金项目“特殊语言障碍儿童普通话体标记习得的实证研究”(21YBA028)的资助。
摘 要:本文基于汉语(有进行体标记)和德语(无进行体标记)母语背景的英语学习者及英语母语者口语语料库,采用构式搭配分析法,从动词情状与时体标记的交互视角,分析动词情状类型与进行体构式的搭配强度,考察目标语输入和母语体标记对汉、德母语者英语进行体产出的影响,揭示不同母语背景者英语进行体习得的认知机制特点。研究结果表明:1)汉、德母语背景的英语学习者和英语母语者使用的英语进行体构式与各类动词的搭配强度不一,搭配强度最高的是原型类活动动词,最低的是非原型类状态动词;2)在原型类活动动词的使用上,学习者更受目标语输入的影响,与英语母语者无显著差异;3)汉、德母语背景学习者和英语母语者在英语进行体使用上的显著差异体现在非原型类完结动词和状态动词的使用上,表明学习者受到母语的影响。本文依据情状体假说,从基于使用的语言观对研究结果进行了解释,并讨论了英语进行体习得的认知机制特点。Mandarin(a language with progressive markers)English learners and a spoken corpus of native English speakers,this study employs collostructional analysis to analyze the collocational strength of verb predicates and progressive constructions from the perspective of interactions between verb predicates and progressive markers in order to determine how the input in the target language and learners'respective first languages influence the production of the English progressive aspect.This study uncovered the characteristics of the cognitive mechanisms underlying the acquisition of English progressive aspect among L1 Mandarin and L1 German learners.The results show the following:1)The collocational strength of verbs with English progressive constructions differs between learners and natives.Prototypical activity verbs exhibit the highest collocational strength with progressive constructions,whereas non-prototypical stative verbs demonstrate the lowest.2)Learners are more likely to be affected by target language input when using prototypical activity verbs,yet show no significant differences from natives.3)Significant differences exist between learners and natives in utilizing non-prototypical collocations such as progressive markings with achievement and stative verbs,indicating the impact of learners'native languages.Drawing on the Aspect Hypothesis,this study interprets the findings from a usage-based perspective,delving into the cognitive mechanisms involved in acquiring English progressive aspect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.217