符号学意义论视野下海德格尔的道言观及其局限  

Heidegger's Views on Tao-language and Its Limitations from the Perspective of the Semiotics of Meaning

作　　者：陈亚玲 Chen Yaling(College of Literature,Chongqing Normal University)

机构地区：[1]重庆师范大学文学院

出　　处：《符号与传媒》2023年第2期110-123,共14页Signs & Media

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“演示叙述原理研究”(2022BZW004);重庆市社科一般项目“存在、符号与解释一一当代中西符号学理论创新研究”(2020YBWX165)中期成果。

摘　　要：与老庄的“道”一样,海德格尔的“道”属于尚未被符号意义化的原初境域,是存在意义的源头,是他力求打破主体性而思问到的源点。不过,他的“道”生世界及其发生情境有明显的人类中心主义、语言中心主义和民族主义倾向,尚有主体哲学残留,他的通“道”之途亦过于局限在狭义语言立场,且如列维纳斯所说缺乏他者,其“道说”只是一种对“总体性”的思考。对海德格尔道言观的反思,提示了其他可能的通“道”之途。The"Tao"of Lao-Zhuang and Heidegger both belong to the original horizon of the meaning of Being and have not been meaningfully or semiotically realised.Based on the original structure of Tao,Heidegger strives to bracket out subjectivity.However,there are still obvious tendencies of anthropocentrism,language-centrism_and nationalism in his world and its happening situation.Heidegger's thought remains within the domain of subjective philosophy and his way to language does not completely emerge from the shadow of the narrow sense of language.As Levinas claimed,Heidegger's way lacks the Other,and"Sage"is just a thought of"Totality".This reflection on Heidegger's views on the Tao-language suggests the possibility of other ways to Tao.

关 键 词：海德格尔 道言观 符号学意义论 

分 类 号：B516.54[哲学宗教—外国哲学] I0[文学—文学理论]