检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王青璐 WANG Qing-lu(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Zhaoqing University,Zhaoqing,Guangdong 526000)
出 处:《汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2023年第5期70-77,96,共9页Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“文学伦理学批评的理论资源与对外传播研究”(21&ZD264);肇庆学院校级科研基金青年项目“后殖民批评视域下的古尔纳小说研究”(QN202205)。
摘 要:在《羚羊与秧鸡》中,玛格丽特·阿特伍德肯定科技能推动人类前进,但又对人类中心主义的局限性和缺乏科技伦理约束的科技发展状况表示担忧。这种矛盾心态在小说里集中反映在科学家秧鸡的形象塑造上,秧鸡受到科技伦理约束,用科技阻止人类对生态共同体的破坏,可错误的道德取向让秧鸡杀死羚羊、制造灾难。小说辩证地思考了科技成果对人类未来的影响。一方面,秧鸡人作为人类增强技术的成果,展现了科技对修复人与生态共同体关系的可能性;另一方面,吉米在灾后世界的遭遇也在警示人类要敬畏自然,维护生态共同体的稳定。In her Oryx and the Crake,Margaret Atwood affirms that science and technology can promote human progress,but she is also worried about the limitations of anthropocentrism and the lack of scientific ethics.This contradictory mentality is mainly reflected in the characterization of the scientist Crake in the novel.Crake is restrained by scientific ethics and with science and technology he prevents human beings’destruction of ecological community,but he also kills Oryx and causes disasters because of his limited moral orientation.The novel dialectically considers the impact of scientific and technological achievements on the future of mankind.On the one hand,as a result of enhanced technology,Crakers show the possibility that science and technology can repair the relationship between human and ecological community,on the other hand,Jimmy’s experience in the post-disaster world warns human beings to revere nature and maintain the stability of ecological community.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.147.211