达米特的形而上学问题探析  

On Dummett’s Metaphysics

作　　者：谢佛荣 张方园 Xie Forong;Zhang Fangyuan(School of Marxism,University of South China,Hengyang,China)

机构地区：[1]南华大学马克思主义学院,湖南衡阳421001

出　　处：《社会科学论坛》2023年第6期69-76,共8页Tribune of Social Sciences

基　　金：2022年国家社会科学基金后期资助项目《关于意义与真理理论的戴维森—达米特之争研究》阶段性成果,项目编号:22FZXB095;教育部高校示范马克思主义学院和优秀教学科研团队建设项目《新时代弘扬大学生伟大民族精神研究》阶段性成果,项目编号:19JDSZK095。

摘　　要：达米特把形而上学问题转化为语言问题,并试图把意义理论作为形而上学的逻辑基础,进而通过阐明可行、系统的意义理论图景来展现形而上学景象。该意义理论必须包含指称理论、涵义理论和力量理论三个组成部分和非循环原则。但由于上述原则没有遵循语言意义的客观性原则,因而达米特以上述原则为基础而构建的反实在论意义理论并不能有效地解决形而上学问题。要使可行、系统的意义理论成为解决形而上学问题的有效方案,须把主体间性的真理概念嵌入于意义理论建构。Dummett transformed metaphysical problems into language problems,tried to take the meaning theory as the logical basis of metaphysics,and then showed the metaphysical scene by clarifying the feasible and systematic picture of meaning theory.Dummett expounded that a feasible and systematic meaning theory must follow the principle that meaning theory should include three components:reference theory,meaning theory and power theory.However,because the above principles do not follow the objectivity principle of language meaning,the anti realistic meaning theory constructed by Dummett based on the above principles can not effectively solve the metaphysical problems.In order to make the feasible and systematic meaning theory an effective solution to metaphysical problems,we must embed the truth concept of intersubjectivity into the construction of meaning theory.

关 键 词：意义理论 形而上学 可行性 反实在论 主体间性 

分 类 号：B15[哲学宗教—世界哲学]