生态后现代主义与马克思主义之自然观探赜  

An Exploration of the Nature Views of Ecological Postmodernism and Marxism

作　　者：吴燚盛 陈云[1] WU Yi-sheng;CHEN Yun(School of Marxism,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350108,China)

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学马克思主义学院,福建福州350108

出　　处：《西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第5期1-10,共10页Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“现代化与生态文明建设的协同推进研究”(18CKS033);福建省政府发展研究中心2022年决策咨询重大项目“永泰山区生态富民的内在逻辑与实践路径研究”(2022JCZX003)。

摘　　要：生态后现代主义与马克思主义在中西方环境哲学界占据重要地位,他们对自然的观点和理解具有可比较性。一是在同构契合层面,两者都采用了联系与统一的哲学分析方法,展现了批判与创新的辩证精神,以及共同追求和谐与发展的生态文明目标。二是在异质分歧层面,无论是基于“泛主体论”的有机哲学,还是基于“人化自然”的唯物史观,各自都批判了“二元对立”的现代性生产和“私有制”的资本主义生产,并展示了“田园牧歌”的后现代图景和“人与自然双重解放”的生态文明。通过整体分析二者关于自然的同构契合与异质分歧,对于构建“全球合作”的人类命运共同体和以人为本的可持续发展,进一步推动人与自然和谐共生,实现现代化的生态文明具有深刻启示。Ecological postmodernism and Marxism occupy an influential position in both the Chinese and Western environmental philosophy circles,and their views on nature are certainly comparable.On the level of isomorphism and mutual fit,both of them,adopting the philosophical analysis method of connection and unity,have the dialectical spirit of criticism and innovation,and share the common goal of harmonious development in ecological civilization.On the level of heterogeneity and divergence,they are based on the organic philosophy “pansubjectivism” or the historical materialism of “humanized nature” respectively to criticize the modern production of “dualistic opposition”or the capitalist production of “private ownership”,and expect to achieve the postmodernity of “idyllic pastoral” or the ecological civilization of “double liberation of man and nature”.An integral analysis of the isomorphic mutual fit and heterogenous divergence of their ideas would be a profound enlightenment for building a community of shared future for mankind through “global cooperation” and the human-oriented sustainable development towards a modern ecological civilization in which humans and nature coexist harmoniously.

关 键 词：生态后现代主义 马克思主义 自然观 生态启示 

分 类 号：X2[环境科学与工程—环境科学] B089[哲学宗教—哲学理论]