检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔占玲[1] 王淑敏 仇不凡 樊志清 路正国 CUI Zhan-ling;WANG Shu-min;QIU Bu-fan;FAN Zhi-qing;LU Zheng-guo(College of Education,Hebei Normal University,Shijiazhuang 050024,China;Shenzhen Bowosi Management Consulting Co,Ltd.,Shenzhen 518110,China;College of Minorities Affiliated With Hebei Normal University,Shijiazhuang 050019,China;Shangdi Experimental Primary School,Haidian District,Beijing 100085,China)
机构地区:[1]河北师范大学教育学院,河北石家庄050024 [2]深圳市博沃思管理咨询有限公司,广东深圳518110 [3]河北师范大学附属民族学院,河北石家庄050019 [4]北京市海淀区上地实验小学,北京100085
出 处:《民族高等教育研究》2023年第5期53-59,87,F0002,共9页Research on Higher Education of Nationalities
基 金:西藏自治区教育科学研究课题“西藏班教师期望知觉与教学风格对数学学习的影响研究”(项目编号:XZJYKTJX64)。
摘 要:考察环境中藏族学生的合作行为及其社会善念和合作者在其中的作用。在内地西藏班学生为被试,采用SoMi范式操纵社会善念水平,用give-some games范式测量合作行为,通过两个实验分别考察汉族主流文化情境下,社会善念与感知社会善念的水平对合作行为的影响,以及合作者的民族类型在其中的作用。结果发现,高社会善念水平的藏族学生与低水平者的合作行为没有显著差异(P>0.05);相比低感知社会善念的藏族学生,高感知社会善念者的合作水平更高(P<0.05);藏族学生被试无论是与藏族同学还是汉族同学合作,合作行为没有显著差异(P>0.05)。这说明,在环境中,藏族学生的合作行为不受社会善念和合作者的民族类型的影响,但会受藏族学生感知社会善念的影响。This article investigates the cooperative behavior of Tibetan students in the context and the role of social mindfulness and collaborators in it.Tibetan students studying in the mainland participated in this study.Through the SoMi paradigm to manipulate the level of social mindfulness,and through the give-some games paradigm to measure cooperative behavior,the study consisted of two experiments,examining the impact of different social mindfulness and the perception of social mindfulness on the cooperative behavior of Tibetan students and the role of the ethnic types of collaborators in the context of Han mainstream culture.The results suggested that there was no significant difference in the cooperative behavior of Tibetan students with high levels of social mindfulness and those with low levels(P>0.05);Compared with Tibetan students with low perception of social mindfulness,those with high perception of social mindfulness had a higher level of cooperation(P<0.05);There was no significant difference in cooperative behavior between Tibetan students and Han students in the Tibetan participants(P>0.05).In the context,social mindfulness and the ethnic types of collaborators do not affect the cooperative behavior of Tibetan students,and the perception of social mindfulness affects the cooperative behavior.
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40