犯罪构成要件事实认定的规范意蕴与诉讼机理  

Normative Implication and Litigation Mechanism of Fact Determination of Constitutive Elements of Crime

作　　者：李海峰 LiHai-feng(Chengdu University,Chengdu 610106,China)

机构地区：[1]成都大学法学院,四川成都610106

出　　处：《政法学刊》2023年第5期68-76,共9页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“经验法则在犯罪构成要件事实认定中的运用问题研究”(20YJA820009)。

摘　　要：犯罪构成要件理论是近代罪刑法定原则的要求与体现,以犯罪构成要件为引领建构和认定案件事实是刑事诉讼程序中的核心内容。犯罪构成要件事实认定本质上作为一项司法认知活动,其内涵与刑事证明、主观判断、价值评价等诉讼因子密不可分,并由认定主体、认定客体、认定方法等三大要素构成。犯罪构成要件事实认定问题遵循着独特的诉讼机理,其深受诉讼模式、审判程序、证明标准、证明模式等多重因素的影响和制约。The theory of constitutive requirements of crime is the requirement and embodiment of the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime in modern times,and it is the core content of criminal procedure to construct and identify the facts of a case under the guidance of constitutive requirements of crime.The fact determination of the constitutive elements of crime is essentially a judicial cognitive activity,and its connotation is inseparable from the litigation factors such as criminal proof,subjective judgment and value evaluation,and consists of three major elements:determination subject,determination object and determination method.The fact determination of the constitutive requirements of crime follows a unique litigation mechanism,which is deeply influenced and restricted by multiple factors such as litigation mode,trial procedure,proof standard and proof mode.

关 键 词：犯罪构成 事实认定 意蕴 机理 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]