检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘凌[1,2] 秦晓晴[2] LIU Ling;QIN Xiaoqing(School of Foreign Languages,Hubei University of Technology;School of Foreign Languages,Central China Normal University,Wuhan,Hubei 430070,China)
机构地区:[1]湖北工业大学外国语学院 [2]华中师范大学外国语学院,湖北武汉430070
出 处:《肇庆学院学报》2023年第6期112-116,122,共6页Journal of Zhaoqing University
基 金:全国高校外语教学科研项目(2019HB0065B)。
摘 要:基于近20年来中国二语词块的综述类研究,分析国内学者几十年来在术语、定义和分类等概念界定问题上未能达成共识的原因及其对国内词块研究的负面影响,提出迫切需要在词块的界定方面达成共识。建议仿照词的定义方式,从形式角度给词块下定义,并基于学界两种主要识别标准将其分为两类:公式化序列和词束。此外,针对由于概念界定分歧给词块研究造成的混乱局面,建议先确定已经基本达成共识的方面,在此基础上逐渐完善词块识别和分类有争议的部分。Based on research synthesis of lexical chunks in a second language(L2)in China in the last 20 years,this paper analyzes the reasons why our researchers have failed to reach consensus on the conceptualization issues,namely terminology,definition,and classification for decades as well as its negative impacts on domestic lexicon research,and proposes the necessity to reach a unified understanding of lexical chunks.We suggest that lexical chunks should be defined from the perspective of form,just like the definition of words;and be divided into two categories:formulaic sequence and lexical bundles.In addition,for the confusion caused by the lack of consensus on conceptualization,which has been proved to hinder further research greatly,we further suggest to settle down the conceptual issues that have basically reached consensus,and then gradually explore the controversial parts of chunk identification and classification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.150