《学衡》和《史地学报》主要作者群关系论析  

An Analysis of The Relations Between Major Writers of Critical Review and Journal of History and Geography

作　　者：张亚栋 王飞虎 Zhang Yadong;Wang Feihu(School of History and Administration,Yunnan Normal University,Kunming 651000,China)

机构地区：[1]云南师范大学历史与行政学院,云南昆明651000

出　　处：《黑河学院学报》2023年第11期162-166,共5页Journal of Heihe University

基　　金：云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目“郑鹤声在云南任教时期的治史研究”(2020Y0335)。

摘　　要：20世纪20年代,创刊于东南大学的《学衡》和《史地学报》,成为新人文主义阵营对抗新文化派的重要学术刊物。两个刊物有各自相应的主要作者群,其组成状况差异明显。回溯至主要作者群在民国大学间的流动,《史地学报》比《学衡》更依赖拥有东南大学背景的学人。计量分析交叉于《学衡》和《史地学报》主要作者群中的南高学子们的投稿数量和发文轨迹,揭示出《学衡》对史学文章的投稿标准高于《史地学报》,而《史地学报》更专注于培育学生。In the 1920s,Critical Review and Journal of History and Geography,founded in Southeast University,became important academic journals for the new humanism camp to fi ght against the new culture school.The two journals have their own corresponding main groups of writers with obviously different composition.Going back to the movement of major groups of writers among the universities in the republic of China,Journal of History and Geography relies more on scholars with southeast university backgrounds than does Critical Review.By making a quantitative analysis on the number of papers submitted to Critical Review and Journal of History and Geography and the track of papers published by the main scholars from Southeast University,it is revealed that the standard of historical articles submitted by Critical Review is higher than that of Journal of History and Geography,which focuses more on cultivating students.

关 键 词：《学衡》 《史地学报》 东南大学 作者群 

分 类 号：K25[历史地理—历史学]