甘泉心学的思想源泉——论湛甘泉与朱熹、陈白沙思想的关系  

The Ideological Source of Ganquan's Mind Study:On the Relationship between ZHAN Ganquan and the Thoughts of ZHU Xi and CHEN Baisha

作　　者：叶智勇 YE Zhi-yong(Foshan Open University,Foshan,Guangdong,China,528000)

机构地区：[1]佛山开放大学,广东佛山528000

出　　处：《广东开放大学学报》2023年第5期73-78,共6页JOURNAL OF GUANGDONG OPEN UNIVERSITY

摘　　要：宋明理学是儒家哲学发展的一座高峰,明代心学更堪称明代理学中的显学。王畿与黄宗羲等人均认为明代心学以陈白沙为开端,以王阳明为集大成。湛甘泉作为陈白沙的衣钵传人,又同为岭南心学的代表人物之一,其哲学体系与陈白沙有着明显的差异。张君劢等认为王阳明才是陈白沙的真正传人,甚至提出湛甘泉属于程朱一系。从湛甘泉的时代背景与为学经历看,湛甘泉哲学体系的构建,是一个逐渐对程朱理学扬弃,而转为心学的历程,其哲学思想中与白沙之学的不合之处,也只是在为学方法和修养论上对白沙的进一步发展,其继承的正是白沙自然、自得的为学宗旨与贵疑的为学精神。因此,从陈白沙到湛甘泉才是明代岭南心学的传承谱系。Neo-Confucianism in the Song and Ming dynasties reached a peak of Confucian philosophy,and the Ming Dynasty's philosophy of mind can be viewed as a prominent study in the Ming Dynasty.WANG Ji and HUANG Zongxi all believed that the Ming Dynasty's philosophy of mind science began with CHEN Baisha and was completed with WANG Yangming.ZHAN Ganquan,as the successor of CHEN Baisha,is also one of the representatives of Lingnan philosophy of mind science.However,his philosophical system is obviously different from CHEN Baisha's.ZHANG Junmai and others believed that WANG Yangming was the true successor of CHEN Baisha,and even proposed that ZHAN Ganquan belonged to the CHENG ZHU school.From the perspective of his historical background and learning experience,the construction of ZHAN Ganquan's philosophical system was viewed as a process of gradually abandoning neo-Confucianism and then turning to mind science.Furthermore,the disparities between ZHAN Ganquan's philosophical thoughts and Baisha’s theory only contributed to the further evolution of the latter's philosophy in terms of learning methods and cultivation theories,because the former inherited Baisha's natural and complacent learning purpose and noble and suspicious learning spirit.Therefore,Lingnan philosophy of mind science in Ming Dynasty should be passed down from CHEN Baisha to ZHAN Ganquan.

关 键 词：明代心学 陈白沙 湛甘泉 为学精神 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学] I206.4