检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张孟科 宋伟 李丹[1,2] 沈秉正[1,2] 陈莹[1,2] 王宗春[1,2] 郭咸希[1,2] Zhang Mengke;Song Wei;Li Dan;Shen Bingzheng;Chen Ying;Wang Zongchun;Guo Xianxi(Department of Pharmacy,Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China;The First Clinical School of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学人民医院药学部,武汉430060 [2]武汉大学第一临床学院,武汉430060
出 处:《中华医学教育探索杂志》2023年第10期1472-1475,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
基 金:武汉大学医学部教学改革研究项目(2019023,2022ZG187)。
摘 要:课程论文评分往往主观性较强,教师在对课程论文进行评分时可能因对特定主题的论文存在偏倚而在评分中引入偏差,导致论文评分不能准确反映学生的真实水平。本文以《临床药理学》课程论文评分结果为实例,对检验课程论文评分结果中是否包含主题偏倚的分析方法进行了探讨。通过计算纵向偏倚因子和横向偏倚因子,比较了同一教师对不同主题的论文和不同教师对同一主题的论文评分上的差异,构建了一种科学、易行的分析方法。该方法可帮助教师快速发现课程论文评分中是否隐含相关偏差,从而使课程论文评分更加客观准确。Course paper grading often involves subjective factors.Teachers may introduce biases into the grading due to their preferences for certain topics,resulting in inaccurate grading results that fail to reflect the true abilities of students.Taking the grading results of the"Clinical Pharmacology"course as an example,this article investigates the analytical method for detecting topic bias in the course paper grading.A comparative analysis was performed on the differences in the scores between different topics graded by the same teacher and between the same topic graded by different teachers by calculating the vertical bias factor and the horizontal bias factor,and a scientific and feasible analytical method was established.This method can help teachers quickly discover biases in their course paper grading,thereby making the grading more objective and accurate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7