基于智慧教室技术的物理科学建模实证研究  

Examining the Impact of Modeling-based Inquiry with Smart Classroom on High School Students’Physics Learning

作　　者：鹿传旺 刘汉平 翟小铭 钱冬 Chuanwang LU;Hanping LIU;Xiaoming ZHAI;Dong QIAN(Shandong Zibo No.1 Middle School,Zibo 255200,Shandong;College of Physics and Electronic Information,Dezhou University,Dezhou 253023,Shandong;Mary Frances Early College of Education,University of Georgia,Athens,Georgia 30602,USA)

机构地区：[1]山东省淄博第一中学,山东淄博255200 [2]山东省淄博第一中学淄博市物理学科基地,山东淄博255200 [3]德州学院物理与电子信息学院,山东德州253023 [4]佐治亚大学(美)教育学院,美国雅典30602

出　　处：《中国教育信息化》2023年第11期97-111,共15页Chinese Journal of ICT in Education

基　　金：2020年度山东省教育教学研究课题“智慧教室教学环境下高中物理科学建模核心素养研究”(编号:2020JXY247)。

摘　　要：随着人工智能技术的发展,基于智慧教室技术的教学对学生核心素养发展的影响广受关注。探索教师运用智慧教室技术开展科学建模教学实践及发展学生学科核心素养可行途径成为必然。以智慧教室画图工具、教学内容和教学策略的融合程度为自变量,通过准实验方法控制自变量,将335名高中学生分为三组实施光学建模教学,研究其对学生物理模型认识和建模能力的影响。研究结果表明,“智慧教室画图工具+小组合作”的学生主动式建模略优于“智慧教室画图工具+教师讲授”的学生验证式被动建模,教师在建模活动中的讲授作用不能忽视。学生主导的小组合作主动式建模更容易使学生的建模水平发生分化,教师主导的学生被动式建模呈现出集约化发展特征,为辩证看待教与学中的师生作用再添新证。With the development of artificial intelligence technology,the impact of teaching based on smart classroom technology on the development of students’core literacy is widely concerned.It has become inevitable to explore feasible ways for teachers to use smart classroom technology to carry out scientific modeling teaching practice and develop students’core discipline literacy.Taking the integration degree of drawing tools,teaching contents,and teaching strategies in the smart classroom as the independent variable,and controlling the independent variable through quasi-experimental methods.We recruited 335 high school students and randomly assigned them to three groups to implement optical modeling teaching and study its impact on students’understanding of physical models and modeling ability.The results show that the student-activated modeling with“smart classroom drawing tool+group collaboration”is slightly better than the student-validated passive modeling with“smart classroom drawing tool+teacher’s lecture”.Of course,the role of teacher’s lecture in the modeling activities cannot be ignored.Student-led group cooperative active modeling is more likely to differentiate students’modeling level,and teacher-led student passive modeling shows intensive development characteristics,which adds new evidence to the dialectical view of the roles of teachers and students in teaching and learning.

关 键 词：智慧教室 画图工具 建模教学 科学建模核心素养 小组合作 

分 类 号：G434[文化科学—教育学]