真理共识论:认罪认罚案件量刑建议的实体效力根据  

Consensus Theory of Truth:Substantive Validity Basis for Sentencing Suggestions on Cases Where the Suspects or Defendants have Pled Guilty and Accepted Punishments

作　　者：韩铁柱 Han Tiezhu(People's Procuratorate of Jiulongpo District,Chongqing 400039,China)

机构地区：[1]重庆市九龙坡区人民检察院,重庆400039

出　　处：《贵州警察学院学报》2023年第5期17-24,共8页Journal of Guizhou Police College

摘　　要：认罪认罚从宽制度中量刑建议的效力问题具有基础性地位,其争议之根源又在于主体问题。应当借鉴哲学上主体性至主体间性的转向,在个案视角中检讨量刑建议在实体适当上的正当性根据。个案量刑对刑事实体法的适用,只能获取合乎主体性理性的似真性幅度。通过量刑协商在法定刑幅度内取得的共识,具有主体间真理共识意义上的客观性和普遍性。量刑建议在真理共识论意义上的实体适当意涵,可以解决量刑情节之认识、形成机制之完善、抗诉问题之处理问题。The validity of sentencing suggestions in the system of lesser penalty for suspects or defendants who have pled guilty and accepted punishments is of fundamental significance,and the source of controversies over this issue mainly lies in the subjects.It is necessary to refer to the shift from subjectivity to inter-subjectivity in philosophy and examine the legitimacy of the sentencing suggestions in terms of substantive appropriateness from the perspective of individual cases.The application of criminal substantive law to sentencing individual cases can only obtain the degree of plausibility conforming to subjective rationality,while the consensus reached within the statutory range of sentences through sentencing consultation has objectivity and universality in the sense of truth consensus among subjects.The substantive proper meaning of sentencing suggestion in the consensus theory of truth can solve the problems in understanding the circumstances of sentencing,perfecting the formation mechanism,and dealing with pleas.

关 键 词：量刑协商 主体间性 真理共识论 一般不当 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]