博士生导师“为导不导”行为的表现类型及生成原因——基于博士生访谈的质性分析  

On the Types and Causes of“No Performance in Supervision”by Doctoral Student Supervisors——A Qualitative Analysis based on Interviews with Doctoral Students

作　　者：曾剑雄 张国栋[1] 王国耀 ZENG Jianxiong;ZHANG Guodong;WANG Guoyao(School of Education,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China)

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学教育学院,上海200240

出　　处：《研究生教育研究》2023年第6期63-70,共8页Journal of Graduate Education

基　　金：全国教育科学规划课题国家一般项目“博士生教育分流退出机制的研究”(BIA200194)。

摘　　要：基于对75名博士生的半结构式访谈,结合计划行为理论,探究博士生导师“为导不导”行为的表现类型与生成原因。研究发现,导师“为导不导”行为类型分为态度型不指导(不想导)、认知型不指导(不会导)与动机型不指导(不愿导)三种。导师“为导不导”行为产生的根源主要在于导师育人责任意识淡薄、岗位管理机制缺失与监督问责体系软化。建议提升导师育人能力,发挥导师共同体作用,加强导师岗位管理,强化监督和问题处理,规制导师“为导不导”行为,增强导师育人质量。Based on semi-structured interviews with 75 doctoral students,the authors use the theory of planned behavior(TPB)to explore the types and causes of"no performance in supervision"by doctoral student supervisors.The study finds that the"no performance in supervision"can be categorized into three types:attitude type(don't want to supervise),cognition type(don't know how to supervise),and motivation type(reluctant to supervise).The deep-seated root causes of"no performance in supervision"are mainly due to the supervisor's weak sense of responsibility to cultivate doctoral students,the lack of post management mechanism and the"softening"of the supervision and accountability system.Accordingly,the authors suggest that,for enhancing the cultivation quality by supervisors,we should improve the ability of supervisors,give more play to the community of supervisors,strengthen the management of the posts for supervisors,reinforce supervision over supervisors,address problems in a timely manner,and punish supervisors for"no performance in supervision".

关 键 词：博士生导师 导师指导 为导不导 消极行为 原因分析 

分 类 号：G643[文化科学—高等教育学]