检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王雨萌 苏拾[1] 冯进良[1] 马韵琪 WANG Yumeng;SU Shi;FENG Jiniang;MA Yunqi(School of Opto-Electronic Engineering,Changchun University of Science and Technology,Changchun 130022)
出 处:《长春理工大学学报(自然科学版)》2023年第6期57-64,共8页Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition)
基 金:吉林省科技发展计划基金(20190302064GX)。
摘 要:甘蔗渣发酵制取乙醇过程中温度控制通常为数字PID控制,为了达到更高的控制要求,加入模糊控制规则,构成Fuzzy-PID控制器,通过Matlab仿真对这两种控制方法的性能指标进行对比,证明了Fuzzy-PID比普通PID控制系统的上升、调节时间短,稳态误差小,提高了发酵过程的动、静态性能指标。使用STEP 7-Micro/WIN软件进行PLC的温度控制程序编程,在同等条件下使用PID和Fuzzy-PID的实验对比,折线图直观对比出Fuzzy-PID的超调量比PID控制降低35%,调节时间缩短20%,有更良好的鲁棒性,之后经反复调试系统,可知在35 s左右系统可稳定设定温度,控制效果符合工艺设计要求。In order to achieve higher control requirements,fuzzy control rules are added to constitute Fuzzy-PID controller,and the performance indicators of these two control methods are compared through Matlab simulation,which proves that Fuzzy-PID is shorter than the rise and adjustment time of ordinary PID control system,and the steady-state error is small,which improves the dynamic and static performance indicators of the fermentation process.Using STEP 7-Micro/WIN software for PLC temperature control program programming,under the same conditions to use PID and Fuzzy-PID experi-mental comparison,the line chart intuitively compared Fuzzy-PID overshoot 35%lower than PID control,adjustment time shortened by 20%has better robustness,and then after repeated debugging of the system.In about 35 s,the system can stably set the temperature,and the control effect meets the process design requirements.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.196.220