《达·芬奇密码》的法律突围之路  

On the Legal Breakthrough of The Da Vinci Code

作　　者：肖爱华[1] 刘汉波[2] XIAO Aihua;LIU Hanbo(Library,Gannan Normal University,Ganzhou 341000,China;School of Chinese Literature,Gannan Normal University,Ganzhou 341000,China)

机构地区：[1]赣南师范大学图书馆,江西赣州341000 [2]赣南师范大学文学院,江西赣州341000

出　　处：《赣南师范大学学报》2024年第1期55-60,共6页Journal of Gannan Normal University

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(21YJA751013)。

摘　　要：在2006年的《达·芬奇密码》诉讼案中,伦敦高院以观点复制没有侵犯原作著作权为由驳回了原告的诉讼请求,这种只注意表达而忽略意义或功能的法律阐释并不充分。要想消除读者心中困惑,还丹·布朗以公道,必须对两部涉案作品进行互文性分析。《达·芬奇密码》的法律突围之路主要有:以想象补足史实、以密码编织故事、以游戏消解真相。In the 2006"Da Vinci Code"lawsuit,the London High Court rejected the plaintiff's lawsuit on the grounds that the reproduction of the viewpoint did not infringe on the copyright of the original work.This legal interpretation that only focuses on expression and neglects meaning or function is not sufficient.In order to dispel the confusion in the minds of readers and provide justice to Dan Brown,it is necessary to conduct a intertextual analysis of the two works involved in the case.In summary,the place where"The Da Vinci Code"surpasses"The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail"is that it supplements historical facts with imagination,weaves stories with codes,and dissolves truth with games.

关 键 词：《达·芬奇密码》 法律突围 互文性写作 

分 类 号：I053.5[文学—文学理论]