谈反训的判定  

On the Determination of the Enantiosemy

作　　者：陈菡[1] Chen Han(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,Hubei,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学文学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《长江学术》2024年第1期116-128,共13页Yangtze River Academic

摘　　要：反训的判定是研究反训的基础,关乎理论建设与实践操作两方面。历代的反训判定可归结为三种模式:“以为然而然”“辨所以然而见然”“定何为然而论然”。论辨其各自特点可知,谈反训的判定必须立足于反训的性质内涵,基本分为两部分,即是否为同一词,是否为对反两义。举“盛”“装”类、“置”类这两则有争议的反训实例进行实践辨析,在判定实践中检验理论与实践的距离,可进一步完善反训的判定理论。The determination of the enantiosemy is the basis for the study of the enantiosemy,and is related to both the theoretical construction and the practical operation.The determinations of the enantiosemy in the past are summarized into three modes:"thinking it is what it is","discerning why to know what"and""defining what to discuss what".Discussing their respective characteristics,it shows that the determination of the enantiosemy must be based on the connotation of the nature,which is basically divided into two parts:whether it is the same word,and whether there are two opposite meanings.Also,the specific determination steps are explained in detail.The two controversial enantiosemy examples of"Cheng"(盛),"Zhuang"(装)and"Zhi"(置)are also discussed and analyzed to further clarify and improve the theory of the enantiosemy determination in the practice.

关 键 词：反训 判定 理论 实践 

分 类 号：H13[语言文字—汉语]