检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:乌都木丽 夏依达·吐尔逊 史永华 WUDU Muli;TUERXUN Xiayida;SHI Yonghua(Department of Pathology,Basic Medical College,Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830017,China)
机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学基础医学院病理学教研室,乌鲁木齐830017
出 处:《基础医学教育》2023年第12期1050-1054,共5页Basic Medical Education
基 金:新疆医科大学教学改革研究基金资助项目(教高函[2020]8号)。
摘 要:为了在新医科背景下通过改变课堂提问方式提高课堂教学质量和效率,夯实本科人才培养,新疆医科大学病理学教研室随机选取参与病理课学习的大二学生355名分为A组和B组,由两位教师用传统的提问方式和改善后的提问方式分别在两个阶段进行教学,每个阶段结束后进行测试,两个阶段都结束后分析比较两组学生成绩变化,并对两组学生进行问卷调查。结果显示,采取改善的课堂提问方式时学生的成绩高于传统提问的学生,且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),不及格学生人数减少,90分以上学生人数增多,学生对改善后的课堂提问方式普遍反响较好。因此,文章认为通过改变课堂提问方式能有效提高医学生的课堂参与度,开拓学生思维,全面提升教学质量的结论。Under the background of New Medicine,the authors conducted research on questioning methods in order to improve the quality and efficiency of classroom teaching and strengthen the cultivation of undergraduate talents.355 sophomore students who took the pathology course were randomly selected and divided into two groups(Group A and Group B).The two groups were taught by two teachers who use traditional questioning method and improved questioning method respectively.The teaching was comprised of two phases,with testing conducted after each phase.The scores of both groups were analyzed and a questionnaire survey was conducted.The results showed that the scores of experimental group were significantly higher than those of control group(P<0.05).The number of failing students decreased,while the number of students with scores above 90 points increased.Students are more satsfied with the improved questioning methods.Therefore,this article concludes that better questioning methods can engage medical students more in classroom,broaden their minds,and improve teaching quality.
关 键 词:基础医学 病理学 教学改革 提问设计 开放式提问 人才培养
分 类 号:G642.0[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.124.95