检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郝春鹏 Hao Chunpeng
机构地区:[1]上海师范大学哲学与法政学院哲学系,上海200234
出 处:《中国社会科学评价》2023年第4期94-101,157,共9页China Social Science Review
摘 要:通过对比苏格拉底的无知之知,可以发现哲学史经过柏拉图和亚里士多德之后,似乎走上了一条逐渐偏离日常哲学的形而上学之路。哲学家们开始越来越远离作为“居间”的人之本质,“异化”到了作为对象的知识与方法上——这在海德格尔看来就是一种关于存在的本真遗忘。在某种程度上,苏格拉底的化知识为德性的无知之知让我们重新回忆起哲学的始基,并构成了对日益学术化、知识化、规范化的哲学史的反思。By comparing with the wisdom of ignorance of Socrates,it can be found that the history of philosophy,after Plato and Aristotle,seems to have embarked on a metaphysical path that gradually deviates from everyday philosophy.Philosophers began to move further and further away from the nature of man as the"in-between,"with their understanding of it"alienated"to knowledge and method as the object.This is,for Heidegger,a forgetting of the true nature of being.In a way,Socrates'wisdom of ignorance,which understands knowledge as virtue,recalls the foundations of philosophy and constitutes a reflection on the history of philosophy,which has become increasingly academic,intellectualized,and normative.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.5.27