检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏欣[1] 杜沛文 SU Xin;Du Peiwen(LuXun Academy of Fine Arts,110004 Shenyang Liaoning)
机构地区:[1]鲁迅美术学院,辽宁沈阳110004
出 处:《设计艺术研究》2023年第6期143-146,共4页Design Research
基 金:辽宁省经济社会发展研究课题(20231s1ybkt-084)。
摘 要:现存“李诫”及《营造法式》自营造学社成立后,在学术界已形成相对统一的主流定义,但从宋代刘跂《暇日记》及相关文本入手,不难发现宋代的建筑史并不能用考古学的实证方式一语概之。以现有历史文本中“李诫”及《营造法式》相关内容的叙述为切入点,通过建构“李诫”与“营造法式”镜像概念生成的主要脉络,试图探究《营造法式》编纂前后所隐含的非典型宋代营造设计思想,并构建出不同于现有建筑史习惯性知识叙述的分析视角。The existing"Li Jie"and Yingzaofashi have formed relatively unified mainstream definitions in the academic circles since the establishment of the Society for the Study of Chinese Architecture.However,if we start from the relevant texts such as Xiariji by Liu Qi in the Song Dynasty,it is not difficult to find that the architectural history of the Song Dynasty can not be summed up by the empirical way of archaeology.By constructing the main context of the generation of the mirror concept of"Li Jie"and Yingzaofashi,the paper tries to explore the atypical Song Dynasty construction design ideas implied before and after the compilation of Yingzaofashi,and construct an analytical perspective different from the existing habitual knowledge narration of architectural history.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7