墨子的“天志“”非命”——兼与儒家“天命”之比较  

Mozi’s“Heavenly Annals”and“Non Destiny”:The Comparison with Confucianism’s“Destiny”

作　　者：王凯[1] WANG Kai(School of Literature,Qingdao University,Qingdao,Shandong 266071,China)

机构地区：[1]青岛大学文学院,山东青岛266071

出　　处：《吉林师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2024年第1期49-55,共7页Journal Of Jilin Normal University:Humanities & Social Science Edition

摘　　要：墨子的“天志”“非命”思想,由“天志”之天,到“天志”之道,再到“非命”之“命”,有着内在的逻辑关联,是墨子对天人关系所作出的新的判断。孟子继承了孔子的天命思想,但又有新的阐释,他把“天命”“天赋”与“人事”相联系,找到一条“尽心,知性”的通达天理之路。墨子的“非命”和孟子的“天命”,都强调了人的后天主观能动作用,这是对他们之前天命观的改造和发挥,对于突破以往天命观的局限和束缚具有深远意义。Mozi’s“Heavenly Annals”and“Non Destiny”thoughts,from“Heavenly Annals”to“Heavenly Annals”and then to“Non Destiny”and“Destiny”,have inherent logical connections and are Mozi’s new judgments on the relationship between heaven and humanity.Mencius inherited Confucius’idea of destiny,but also had a new interpretation.He linked“destiny”,“talent”and“personnel”,and found a path of“wholehearted and intellectual”understanding of the principles of heaven.Mozi’s“non des⁃tiny”and Mencius’s“heavenly destiny”both emphasize the subjective and active role of human beings,which is a transformation and development of their previous views on heavenly destiny,and has profound significance in breaking through the limitations and constraints of previous views on heavenly destiny.

关 键 词：墨子 天志 非命 天命 

分 类 号：B224[哲学宗教—中国哲学]