检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:史军 张芊芊 SHI Jun;ZHANG Qianqian(School of Marxism,Jinan University,Guangzhou 510632,China)
机构地区:[1]暨南大学马克思主义学院,广东广州510632
出 处:《医学与哲学》2024年第2期28-32,共5页Medicine and Philosophy
基 金:2021年国家社会科学基金重大项目(21&ZD057);2020年国家社会科学基金重点项目(20AZX018)。
摘 要:疫情防控会造成个人与社会之间的“成功悖论”:虽然疫情防控给社会带来了整体利益,但具体的参与者个人却似乎没有得到什么实际的利益;于是,当疫情防控成功一段时间之后,一些强制性防控措施就会日益受到质疑,越来越多的人会选择逃避防控的“免费搭车”行为,直到再次暴发疫情。“成功悖论”反映出疫情防控中个人权利与公共健康之间的冲突:为了社会整体健康而限制个人权利是否能够得到伦理辩护?悖论的根源在于自由主义价值观导致了个人与社会的割裂,而强调人类命运共同体与人类卫生健康共同体的社会主义价值理念有助于克服这一悖论。Epidemic prevention and control can lead to the"success paradox"between individuals and society:although epidemic prevention and control bring overall benefits to society,individual participants seem to gain little practical benefits.After a period of successful epidemic prevention and control,some compulsory prevention and control measures are increasingly questioned,and more and more people choose to engage in"free-riding"behavior,until another outbreak occurs.The"success paradox"reflects the conflict between individual rights and public health epidemic prevention and control:can restricting individual rights for the overall health of society be ethically justified?The root of the paradox lies in the liberal values that lead to the separation of individuals and society,while emphasizing the socialist values of the human community and the public health community can help overcome this paradox.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7